“. . . the governor … made it clear that he is ready to dig in for the long haul, that he is not going to be . . . forced into some short-term solution that is not good for the state in the long run. That was made clear,” Senate Republican leader Christine Radogno of Lemont said of the current gridlock.Get ready, says another Republican, referring to the Rauner strategy.
“If you are in the legislature and you’re on the wrong side and don’t have a thick skin, prepare to get singed, burnt and blown up,” said one Republican senator not authorized to speak publicly about the closed-door meetings with Rauner. “He is lining up all the ammunition and is ready to go.”From Madigan, referring to Rauner:
“If people are operating in the extreme, . . . he’s on the extreme, . . . operating in the extreme,”From Rauner:
Rauner’s office issued two news releases blasting Madigan as “unwilling” to compromise.Neutral observer:
Inside the bubble of the Statehouse amid hardening positions, “each side thinks it’s right and each side thinks they have public opinion with them,” said one veteran lobbyist who did not want to be identified publicly to avoid risking jeopardizing relationships.Republicans say:
Republicans point to a June 30 deadline for the Chicago Public Schools to make a scheduled $634 million payment to the Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund as a pressure point for Democrats to negotiate.Also:
Another pressure point: Democrats are expected to hold onto the bills advancing their budget plan rather than quickly forward them to a governor who has pledged to veto them.The AFSCME matter:
[T]he Rauner administration is negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement for July 1 with the state’s largest public union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Negotiations have not made much progress so far, and AFSCME contends Rauner is attempting to advance several of his points to weaken public employee unions [using this bargaining].Reason for thinking so:
Back in March 2013, in the early days of his GOP primary campaign for governor, Rauner said he might “take a strike and shut the government down for a few weeks” and said he knew of few politicians who would be willing to do that. “I won’t be happy doing it, but I will do it proudly because it’s the right thing to do.”
He used such fighting words in a River Forest rally Nov. of 2013.
Dems fight with no-strike legislation, the Trib story continues:Illinois is “in deep trouble,” Republican candidate for governor Bruce Rauner told a River Forest cafe audience Thursday night . . .Go after government unions, for one thing, whose “bosses bribe politicians.” . . . . Unions have “bought [even] a number of Republicans.” To the unions Rauner would say, “You can’t bribe me.” He would limit collective bargaining rights if need be, as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker did. It’s “a key part” of his platform.
Democrats supportive of AFSCME sent the governor legislation creating the option of arbitration which, if chosen, would prevent a strike or lockout of public workers in the event contract talks stall. But there is little doubt that Rauner would veto such a measure.Leading to an overtime session, before which
rank-and-file lawmakers [will have] an opportunity to gauge the political winds in their home districts and what, if any, public impact exists over the current rancor as well as who is to blame.
Enter lotsa Rauner money, the life blood of political warfare
That’s where the Rauner TV ad campaign comes in, though there are questions about its effectiveness in summer, when many viewers are focused on the outdoors rather than televisions showing political advertising.Summertime, when the livin' is easy and watch political fight ads on TV?
The beach and al fresco coffee in the morning, or glued to tube to hear the latest?
Hint: Don't rule out the one-eyed monster, or the virtually subliminal effect of quickies during the evening news. In any case, stay tuned . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment